Masjedian Law Firm · Employment
Workplace Harassment
No one is paid to endure abuse. California law reaches both quid pro quo demands and the hostile environment that management tolerates.
No one is paid to endure abuse. California law reaches both quid pro quo demands and the hostile environment that management tolerates.
Workplace harassment takes two legal shapes in California: quid pro quo — job benefits conditioned on submitting to sexual advances — and hostile work environment, where severe or pervasive conduct based on a protected characteristic alters the conditions of employment. Both violate FEHA, and harassment protections apply to employers of any size, including a single employee.
Employer responsibility is broad. When the harasser is a supervisor, the employer is strictly liable. For coworker or third-party harassment, the employer is liable when it knew or should have known and failed to take prompt, effective corrective action. “We investigated and moved you to another shift” is often evidence of the problem, not a cure.
What a case looks like. Unwelcome advances, touching, sexual comments or messages, slurs and demeaning conduct tied to sex, race, orientation, disability, or another protected trait, retaliation after rejecting advances or reporting conduct. A single severe incident (such as an assault) can be enough; so can a pattern that management watched happen.
Protect the record. Save messages, screenshots, schedules, and names of witnesses; report in writing where feasible so the employer’s notice is documented; and keep copies off employer-controlled systems. Retaliation for reporting — cut hours, write-ups, termination — is a separate violation that strengthens the case.
Remedies and process. Emotional distress damages are the heart of harassment cases, alongside lost pay where the harassment forced you out (constructive discharge), punitive damages, and FEHA fee-shifting. Claims begin with a Civil Rights Department filing, generally within three years.
Conduct based on a protected characteristic that is severe or pervasive enough to alter working conditions — judged from the perspective of a reasonable person in your position. One severe incident can qualify; so can an accumulation of demeaning conduct.
Yes, in your favor: California imposes strict liability on employers for supervisor harassment. The company is responsible even if upper management claims it didn’t know.
Potentially yes, especially for supervisor harassment where reporting is not required for liability. Reporting strengthens coworker-harassment claims by establishing employer notice, but fear of retaliation explains silence — and juries understand that.
Retaliation for reporting is independently illegal under FEHA and gives rise to its own claim — often stronger than the underlying harassment claim, because the timing is so provable.
Yes. Consultations are protected and private, and no step is taken — including any contact with your employer — without your decision.
Submissions are reviewed directly by the attorney. Confidential.